| War On Drugs Hijacked Sandra Bennett - Thursday, March 24, 2005 We should have no problem using the terminology "the War On Drugs" waging "WAR" on something is the terminology we have always used to describe fighting a scourge. |
|
Home
|
We should have no problem using the terminology "the War On Drugs" waging "WAR" on something is the terminology we have always used to describe fighting a scourge. The U.S. declared the War On Poverty in 1960 and has spent more than Six Trillion dollars fighting that battle, a battle continuing to be drawn out primarily because of the poverty that so often accompanies addiction to illicit drugs. Over the years we have declared a War On Cancer, a War on Polio, a War on Illiteracy, a War On Crime, a War On Obesity, and the War on AIDS, just to name a few "War" analogies. Some of these battles have been winnable but most are not. However, the US is certainly not going to give up on the war on poverty or AIDS, no matter how drawn out and arduous the fight is going to be. And we certainly would not substitute the word WAR with something as innocuous as "Skirmish," or "Hostilities," when fighting such terrible foes. Obviously one cannot always predict either an end or an exit strategy to a war. A war is over when one side capitulates (surrenders) or is clearly victorious. What one can do, however, is define what constitutes a victory and aim for that. For example, if you invested $50,000 in the stock market and in one year earned $10,000 (a 20% return), that would be considered highly successful or a "WIN." However, when drug use dropped more than 50% in the ten years between the late 1970's and the late 1980's, halving the $160 billion annual cost of illicit drug use, the legalizers and the media insisted that since drug use had not been completely eradicated we should give up and declare the war lost. This is simply a marketing ploy by individuals and institutions who do not want the War On Drugs to be won. They are the equivalent of Tokyo Rose who, during WWII, repeatedly broadcast to our troops that they were losing the war, trying to undermine their morale in the hopes that they would give up and go home. And the exact same thing is happening today. The legalizers and the media, the Tokyo Roses of the War on Drugs, constantly whine that we are losing the War On Drugs and so should surrender and let drug use rule. Violent crimes have always been illegal but they continue to plague society despite our best efforts to deter them. Does that mean we should give up and turn our back on murder? Rape? Kidnapping? Corporate plundering? We certainly are not going to legalize corporate crime simply because we have been unable to deter it. Can you imagine how widespread these problem would be if there were not laws against it. The United States would cease to exist in the ensuing debacle. Society is going to have to understand that human nature being what it is, and the media being what it is (the devil with a printing press), we are always going to be having to fight the darker side of humanity whether it is oppression, drugs, gambling, poverty, illness, terrorism, or any of the other frailties that man succumbs to when he has lost his moral compass. And drugs are the grease on the slippery slope that leads to all this misery and decadence. |
Absolute
News Manager
: news publishing software and web content management system by
Xigla Software |
|
The article has been moved here